| 
Racing Faster
The Prescription for Getting an Edge (and/or Dying Young)
By Roland Rust November/December For the Washington Running Report
Recently, Baltimore Orioles baseball star Rafael Palmeiro was in
the news. First, he testified on Capitol Hill that he had never
used steroids. Then, not long afterward, Major League Baseball
suspended him for steroid use. He now hedges his steroid denial,
saying that he has never "intentionally" used steroids. Accused
drug cheaters are now widespread in baseball, with the ranks of
the accused including such stars as record setting home run
hitters Barry Bonds and Mark McGuire. Likewise, seven-time Tour
de France bicycle race winner Lance Armstrong has long fended
off accusations of drug use, with suspicions raised by his
consultation of an Italian coach connected to a history of drug
suspensions. Everywhere we turn, there are high-profile athletes
being accused of illegal drug use.
The will to win has long caused athletes to cut corners, and
running is no exception. In 1980 I ran the Boston Marathon. As
my race fell apart after 22 miles, I saw the first woman, Jackie
Gareau of Canada, steam by me. I never saw the woman who was
crowned the winner, Rosie Ruiz of New York City. Ruiz didn't
pass anybody else in the first 22 miles, either, and she was
eventually disqualified. She was later found to have ridden the
subway to get from the start of the New York Marathon to the
finish. Masters runners cheat, too. I knew one runner who
claimed to have won the steeplechase in the national masters
track championship. I checked, and his name did not appear in
the official results. Later, he recorded astounding performances
(far better than usual) at both the Marine Corps Marathon and
the Boston Marathon. At Boston, he went to the trouble of
passing the starting line chip checkpoint, half-way chip
checkpoint, and finish line, but was not seen on video at any
intermediate point. He was disqualified for life, and now no
longer competes, even in his hometown.
Even for runners who actually complete the distance, there is a
long history of cheating in running. The Eastern Bloc countries
are now well known to have had an active steroid program in the
1960's, 70's, and 80's, with the women athletes recording
astonishing world records and often looking grotesquely and
artificially muscular. As steroid testing got better, such
blatant steroid use began to be caught, and the playing field
was leveled. This did not keep such athletes as banned Canadian
sprinter Ben Johnson from using prodigious amounts of steroids
and recording monstrous performances.
Even 25 years ago, the temptation for aspiring distance runners
to use steroids and other drugs was very real. When my times
improved to the point that I was defeating some national caliber
runners, I was approached by a trainer who said he could get
me "anything I want." I declined, but I am sure there were many
who did not.
Based on my knowledge of the sport, there are many drugs that
runners use to improve their performance. Steroids, the most
famous of the performance-enhancing drugs, work best for women
(and perhaps older men). Many young men can become too bulked up
by taking steroids, and their distance running performance can
suffer. Human growth hormone is another drug, more difficult to
test for, that has steroid-like muscle-enhancing effects. Some
runners also use anti-asthma inhalers, which may actually be
performance enhancing for normal runners. The sports agencies
have begun to crack down on the illicit use of inhalers. Except
for national meets and top-rank marathons, there is little drug
testing in distance running. At the masters level there is
almost no drug testing.
The drug of choice for distance runners is EPO. EPO is a drug
that enhances the production of red blood cells, increasing the
blood's oxygen-carrying capabilities. There have now been many
runners caught using EPO. The poor man's EPO is "blood doping,"
a technique brought into the spotlight in the 1970's when the
Finns were accused of using it before the 1972 Olympics. In
blood doping, blood is taken from the runner some months ahead
of time; the red blood cells are separated from the rest of the
blood, and then reinjected into the body shortly before the
targeted competition.
The reason runners use these methods is that, properly done,
they really can improve performance. Unfortunately, there is a
significant negative side. Use of steroids has been linked to
heart attacks at a young age and various types of cancers,
especially testicular cancer. Many suspected that it was not
coincidence that Florence Griffith Joyner, the Olympic Gold
medalist sprinter, showed such a phenomenal physical
transformation in a short time, and then died of heart trouble
in her 30's. EPO has also been blamed for many athlete deaths
(most of them cyclists), with the wrong dosage having turned the
blood to sludge.
The future of drug use in running is likely to make today's
methods look like child's play. Currently being researched in
medical labs are techniques that involve injections to literally
change the muscle's DNA. Such methods can engineer whatever kind
of muscle the athlete wants, with a marathon runner, for
example, having just the right blend of fast twitch and slow
twitch muscles, using a method that is, for all practical
purposes, undetectable. By the 2008 Olympics, or 2012 at the
latest, we should see astonishing gains in all sports, as the
first wave of genetic cheaters bioengineers the perfect
musculature.
Where will it all end? I'm not sure, but I can't help but notice
the parallel with the battle between amateurism and
professionalism in the early 1900's. At that time, any athlete
who took money for competing or who hired a professional coach
was considered no better than a cheat. By the end of the 20th
Century, though, professionalism had taken over in all top-level
sports. Maybe the end solution is to stop testing for cheaters.
If cheating is legalized, then there will be no cheaters. Sure,
the athletes will be freaks who have serious health risks and
short life expectancies, but maybe that is what the audience
demands.
(Editor's Note: The Professional Road Running Organization
(PRRO) announced September 7, 2005 that circuit events would
initiate in-competition drug testing beginning in 2006. The
events include the World's Best 10K in San Juan, Puerto Rico
(Feb. 26), Credit Union Cherry Blossom 10 Mile in Washington, DC
(Apr. 2), Lilac Bloomsday 12K in Spokane, WA (May 7), Peachtree
Road Race 10K, in Atlanta, GA (Jul. 4) and the Boilermaker 15K
in Utica, NY (Jul. 9). "We heard the concerns of elite athletes
about wanting a level playing field in the sport of long
distance running. This action brings that goal closer," said
PRRO President Julia Emmons after the organization's Board
Meeting in July. "We encourage other events to join us in being
pro-active in this area." Read the press release at
http://www.runningnetwork.com/news/prroSept05drugtesting.html.)
About This Site |
About Running
Network |
Privacy Policy |
(c) 2001 All Rights Reserved |
Contact Us |
FAQ |
Advertise With Us |
Help |
Site Map
|
|