More than five hours into a 24-mile run-already more than twice
as long as I had ever taken to race that far-I looked straight
up at the next stretch and resignedly began walking again. So
went Stage 1of the Himalayan Run & Trek. One-hundred miles over five days in the Himalayas-yes, those
Himalayas-daunting, but doable, I thought some weeks before
during an easy 10-mile run along the C & O Canal. Sure, the air
would be thin, racing in India would pose obvious logistical
issues, and mountains by definition would include some serious
climbs. But I had twice run the JFK 50-mile ultramarathon,
winning once, and I figured I could manage a five-day mountain
stage race that amounted to not much more than one week of high
mileage.
Turned out I miscalculated on just about every point.
Surprisingly, running at altitude of up to 13,000 feet was not
so bad-five days of acclimatization surely helped. As for the
race logistics, aid stations with a glucose drink, bananas, and
baked potatoes helped, but experienced stage-race ultrarunners,
of whom there were many at the event, wore CamelBaks filled
with electrolyte drinks and carried PowerBars and energy gels.
I hand-carried only a water bottle and completely bonked on
that eye-opening first day.
The mountains, however, provided the biggest shocker: the
uphill climbs were obviously difficult, in bike terms, hors
categorie climbs that simply could not be run. Downhill
was, for me, worse, as my inclination toward survival mandated
caution while picking my way over giant cobblestones.
Experienced downhill runners trusted their wilder instincts and
took their chances with gravity. My times and place suffered
badly on every downhill stretch.
Trekking is not a word Americans use, but the European runners
were not surprised that so much of the event included hiking. I
learned later that several of them chuckled at my early
impertinence, more properly simply foolishness, after I ran,
however slowly, the first few uphill miles of Stage 1. By the
last mile, I was using the stone roadside barriers as anchors
to pull on and hoist me toward the finish. In one day, we had
climbed a total of some 10,000 feet, dropped 3,700, and my
average pace was more than 15 minutes per mile. I finished
seventh of 58 runners but I did not think I could run the next
day.
I hoped a hot shower and comfortable bed would revive my body
and my spirits, but cleaning up was limited to a bucket of warm
water and sleeping arrangements consisted of a dormitory room
filled with a dozen or so beds. A generator provided minimal
electricity but no heat, and temperatures on the mountain
dipped toward freezing once the sun set.
Honest-to-God sherpas, however, provided plenty of plain but
nourishing food, notably a salty potato soup of which I must
have slurped a dozen cups in my depleted and dehydrated state.
As other runners made their way into the cabin and huddled
around a charcoal-burning can, we shared tales from the trail
and began to feel better. A few runners had abandoned that
stage and caught a ride to our outpost in the jeep of shame-no
one blamed them. But nearly all, including a 69-year-old
English grandmother, completed the arduous trek. And so at 6:30
the next morning, everybody started anew.
"Adventure racing is not for idiots," Himalayan Run & Trek
director C.S. Pandey exhorted weary participants without a
trace of irony midway through the event. "You've got to keep
thinking every step of the way."
Pandey, a well-meaning martinet during our week together, was
certainly correct. Successful ultrarunners solve problems
during a race. Not math problems or even figuring out splits,
which is difficult toward the end of any race. But they find
solutions to the more subtle physical and psychological
challenges that inevitably present themselves over the course
of a long run. Issues include pace, when to walk, how to tack
through and navigate gullies so deep they scraped elbows, when
and how to manage caloric intake, monitoring physical reserves,
and other critical mental adjustments, and mean the difference
between racing and just finishing. Such strategies simply
overwhelmed this canal and bike-path running American, so
mostly I just finished.
All of which begs the question: why travel halfway around the
world to abuse oneself so mightily? Fair enough, and I will
avoid cliches about a sense of accomplishment and camaraderie
fostered through pain, arm-in-arm finishes, and plenty of beer
shared with runners from around the world-all true. Side-trips
to Delhi, Darjeerling, and the Taj Mahal provided more obvious
benefits.
Running 100 miles in the Himalayas is not for everyone. But
travel, like running, is about living hard and expanding one's
realm of experiences. I sit now in front of my PC and look with
awe at the photo reprinted with this story and envy that
runner, hardly believing it is me. Spectacular views of Mt.
Katchenjunga and Everest were alone worth the grueling plane
trip. If running is our purest form of self-expression, then
testing ourselves through racing in a challenging foreign
environment is plumbing our very depths. Do not ask the
question and you will never know the answer.